Housing Dynamics

From Ed Glaeser, Joseph Gyourko, Eduardo Morales and Charles Nathanson:

The volatility of housing prices and construction levels is high. Both price changes and permits exhibit strong positive serial correlations at one year frequencies. Prices, but not permits, show strong mean reversion over five year periods. Can these facts be reconciled with a dynamic housing model, where in the tradition of Rosen and Roback, prices reflect the value of access to an area’s income and amenities? We calibrate a dynamic spatial equilibrium model and find that it can fit some, but far from all, of the key empirical features of America’s housing markets. Long-run mean reversion is compatible with the model, but short-term positive price change persistence is not. Highly volatile prices and construction are compatible with the model if local wage levels follow close to a random walk, but not if there is more mean reversion in wages. Using HMDA income data allows our model to match most observed housing market volatility, but using BEA income data does not.

About ozidar

I'm an Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and a Faculty Research Fellow at National Bureau of Economic Research. You can follow me on twitter @omzidar. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/owen.zidar/index.html
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s