Even if President Obama wins all the tax increases on the rich that he is asking for, the long-term fiscal picture will still look grim. Perhaps we can stabilize the situation for a few years just by taxing the rich, but as greater numbers of baby boomers retire and start collecting Social Security and Medicare, more will need to be done.
Which brings us back to the middle class. When President Obama talks about taxing the rich, he means the top 2 percent of Americans. John A. Boehner, the House speaker, talks about an even thinner slice. But the current and future fiscal imbalances are too large to exempt 98 percent or more of the public from being part of the solution.
Ultimately, unless we scale back entitlement programs far more than anyone in Washington is now seriously considering, we will have no choice but to increase taxes on a vast majority of Americans. This could involve higher tax rates or an elimination of popular deductions. Or it could mean an entirely new tax, such as a value-added tax or a carbon tax.
To be sure, the path ahead is not easy. No politician who wants to be re-elected is eager to entertain the possibility of higher taxes on the middle class. But fiscal negotiations might become a bit easier if everyone started by agreeing that the policies we choose must be constrained by the laws of arithmetic.
I'm an Economics Ph.D. student at UC Berkeley focusing on public finance topics at the intersection of labor economics and macroeconomics. My current research focus is on the interaction of corporate taxation, firm location decisions, and the location and scale of economic activity. You can follow me on twitter @omzidar.
- 2012 Alan Auerbach Baumol's cost Brad Delong Budget Capital Capital Taxation College Corporate Profits Corporate Taxes david autor David Card debt Dylan Matthews Economic Growth Economic Policy Education Emmanuel Saez Enrico Moretti Europe Finance Fiscal Cliff Fiscal Policy Government Government Spending Great Recession Growth Hamilton Project Healthcare Healthcare Costs Health Insurance Housing Housing Finance Immigration Incidence inequality Innovation Investment Jeremy Stein Job Market Paper Jobs Justin Wolfers Labor Labor Markets Labor Share larry summers Laura Tyson Local Labor Markets Macroeconomics Medicare Middle Class mobility Monetary Policy NYTimes Obama Pat Kline Paul Krugman Political Economy Politics Productivity Profits Raj Chetty Regulation Robots Spending States Stimulus Tax Cuts for Whom Taxes Tax Reform Technological Change Thomas Piketty Unemployment Wages Yuriy Gorodnichenko
- Immigrants and Native Workers: New Analysis Using Longitudinal Employer-Employee Data
- Evidence on the Consequences of Banning Affirmative Action
- Behavioral Responses to an Annual Wealth Tax: Evidence from Sweden
- Localized and Biased Technologies: Atkinson and Stiglitz’s New View, Induced Innovations, and Directed Technological Change
- Congrats to Matt Gentzkow on winning the JBC Medal!
- Tapping the Brakes: Are Less Active Markets Safer and Better for the Economy?
- The Euro and the Geography of International Debt Flows
- Weekend Links: Understanding Piketty, Falling Interest Rates, Secular Stagnation, etc
- Immigrants and Native Workers: New Analysis Using Longitudinal Employer-Employee Data wp.me/p2otxR-At 3 hours ago
- Berkeley is awesome. Great lineup over the next few days http://t.co/Bg5GqocIVF 8 hours ago
- Solow on Piketty via @tnr newrepublic.com/article/117429… 9 hours ago
- Evidence on the Consequences of Banning Affirmative Action wp.me/p2otxR-Ar 9 hours ago
- RT @bblockwood: New study on Swedish data: wealth taxes don't distort saving, but do cause misreporting. (h/t @omzidar) http://t.co/jFT4O27… 1 day ago
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012